Android Crackme and Structure offset propagation

June 16, 2018

Today we will look into the recently introduced feature in r2 - structure offset propagation.

We will use it to solve a crackme based on reversing an Android JNI (Java Native Interface) library.Beware that the feature is still WIP and being constantly improved.

This challenge is originally from NDH2012-wargame, so we are provided with an NDH.apk file, now after decompiling and using JD-GUI to browse through the code we can find some interesting functions :

// Java source file
static
{
     System.loadLibrary("verifyPass");
}
NDHActivity localNDHActivity = NDHActivity.this;
String str1 = this.val$tv2.getText().toString();
String str2 = localNDHActivity.print(str1);

After reading through the code we can find that the validation routine is contained in a JNI lib file.

$ file libverifyPass.so
libverifyPass.so: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, ARM, EABI5 version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, stripped

So let’s start by opening it in IDA r2 -

$ r2 ./libverifyPass.so
[0x00000f50]> aaa
...
[0x00000f50]> afl
0x00000f38    1 12           sym.imp.__gnu_Unwind_Find_exidx
0x00000f44    1 12           sym.imp.difftime
0x00000f50    1 12           entry0
0x00000f60   15 500          sym.Java_com_app_ndh_NDHActivity_print
...

We could easily spot the “sym.(..).print” function that was called from the java source file

[0x00000f60]> pdf
|   sym.Java_com_app_ndh_NDHActivity_print ();
| ; var int local_4h @ sp+0x4
  ....
| 0x00000f60      30b5     push {r4, r5, lr}
| 0x00000f62      cdb0     sub sp, 0x134
| 0x00000f64      7e4c     ldr r4, [0x00001160]
| 0x00000f66      7c44     add r4, pc
| 0x00000f68      0390     str r0, [sp + local_ch] //
| 0x00000f6a      0291     str r1, [sp + local_8h] // Arguments stored in stack
| 0x00000f6c      0192     str r2, [sp + local_4h] //
  ....
| 0x00000f76      039b     ldr r3, [sp + local_ch]
| 0x00000f78      1a68     ldr r2, [r3] // JNIEnv struct loaded
| 0x00000f7a      a923     movs r3, 0xa9
| 0x00000f7c      9b00     lsls r3, r3, 2
| 0x00000f7e      d358     ldr r3, [r2, r3]
 ....
| 0x00000f8a      9847     blx r3

We could see that one of the arguments passed to this print function is a JNIEnv struct pointer which contains info about many callback functions (For detailed explaination about JNI , take a look at this wiki)

This program uses such type of call 3 times, with the indexes 0x2A4, 0x290 and 0x29C.

To retreive the names of corresponding functions, we can directly use jni.h file or this doc which contains indexes in JNIEnv interface function table :

0x24A / 4 = 169 --> const jbyte* GetStringUTFChars(JNIEnv *env, jstring string, jboolean *isCopy);
0x290 / 4 = 164 --> jsize GetStringLength(JNIEnv *env, jstring string);
0x29C / 4 = 167 --> jstring NewStringUTF(JNIEnv *env, const char *bytes);

As you can see it’s a bit painful process, this is where our struct offset propagation comes into picture!

[0x00000f60]> to ./jni.h (load the header file)
[0x00000f60]> ts 
_JavaVM
JNIInvokeInterface
JNINativeInterface
_JNIEnv

You can either use ESIL emulation or debugging to find the address of JNIEnv struct. For sake of simplicity, we will use the address that is mapped to our SP (Stack Pointer), which is 0x00000000 as we see from the output below:

:> px $w @ sp
- offset -   0 1  2 3  4 5  6 7  8 9  A B  C D  E F  0123456789ABCDEF
0x00000000  7f45 4c46                                .ELF

As we saw from the pdf output above, the stack pointer (SP) is being used as the base pointer with different offsets from local variables. This means that the base of our JNIEnv structure is whatever the value of SP at the time.

:> px $w @ [sp]
- offset -   0 1  2 3  4 5  6 7  8 9  A B  C D  E F  0123456789ABCDEF
0x464c457f  ffff ffff                                ....

From what we can see here, [SP] here is 0x464c457f. This actually represents the first few bits of an ELF binary’s header. Now link both the struct and address using tl command and watch the magic happen :)

[0x00000f60]> tl JNINativeInterface = 0x464c457f
[0x00000f60]> pdf
...
| 0x00000f7c      9b00   lsls r3, r3, 2
| 0x00000f7e      d358   ldr r3, [r2, r3] ; JNINativeInterface.GetStringUTFChars
| 0x00000f84      081c   adds r0, r1, 0
| 0x00000f86      111c   adds r1, r2, 0
| 0x00000f88      0022   movs r2, 0
| 0x00000f8a      9847   blx r3
...
| 0x0000100e      d358   ldr r3, [r2, r3] ; JNINativeInterface.GetStringLength
| 0x00001010      0399   ldr r1, [sp + local_ch]
| 0x00001012      019a   ldr r2, [sp + local_4h]
| 0x00001014      081c   adds r0, r1, 0
| 0x00001016      111c   adds r1, r2, 0
| 0x00001018      9847   blx r3
....
| 0x00001110      a723   movs r3, 0xa7
| 0x00001112      9b00   lsls r3, r3, 2
| 0x00001114      d258   ldr r2, [r2, r3] ; JNINativeInterface.NewStringUTF

Finally moving on to the solution of this challenge, we can see that there are some string length checks happening, and at last two strings are loaded from .rodata section which is xored together to print the flag

>> a = [0x52,0x1A,0x09,0x7B ...]
>> b = [0x5C,0x20,0x72,0x10 ...]
>> "".join( [ chr(a[i] ^ b[i]) for i in range(len(a)) ] )
'Radare2_is_great' (obviously not the flag, try it on ur own to get it :P)